Change Your Image
best-review
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againReviews
Manamey (2024)
Boring and predictable.
The story begins with an intriguing premise but quickly devolves into a predictable, routine, and rather dull affair. The screenplay is quite flat, offering a few laughs here and there, but is often clumsy. The director, it seems, brought no personal touch to the project.
Sharvanand looks quite dashing and his performance is commendable. Kriti Shetty also looks fine and takes on a different role compared to her previous films, showing some improvement in her acting. The rest of the cast does exactly what's expected of them.
The music is uninspired, though the production values are impressively high. The cinematography is excellent, but the editing leaves much to be desired. Overall, not worth the watch.
Satyabhama (2024)
👎
The story of the movie is quite good but several elements come across as unconvincing. While the screenplay manages to create a few compelling sequences, the majority of it feels flat and uninteresting. The narration lacks engagement, making it hard for the audience to stay invested in the plot. Though there are moments where the suspense works, these are few and far between. Unfortunately, the climax is a letdown. There is a plot twist that comes off as rather silly.
Direction in the film is subpar, failing to elevate the material or bring out the best in the cast.
Kajal, the leading actress, neither looks her best nor delivers a noteworthy performance. Her acting has always been underwhelming, and she typically avoids roles that demand significant acting chops. However, even when given a more demanding role, she disappoints despite showing clear effort and dedication.
On a brighter note, Naveen Chandra and the supporting cast do a commendable job, bringing some life to their characters. The music, however, fails to leave an impression and does little to enhance the viewing experience. The cinematography is merely okay, not particularly memorable but serviceable. Production quality is decent, meeting the basic standards without standing out.
In conclusion, this film is not worth the trip to the theater. If you're really interested, you might consider watching it on an OTT platform, but even then, it's a marginal recommendation.
Chaitanya (1991)
NA
Premise:
Chaitanya is the head mechanic for the upcoming Roots Challenge 1991 Automotive Rally, which runs from Chennai to Goa, a route notorious for illegal drug and arms trafficking. Retired Major Harischandra Prasad is the rally's chief guest, and his daughter Padmini is among the competitors vying for the Roots Challenge Trophy.
Review
The story starts off intriguing but loses steam as it progresses. The screenplay is uneven, with some scenes standing out while others fall flat. The climax twists are disappointingly predictable. The romantic subplot is lackluster and unconvincing.
On the plus side, the locations and cinematography are commendable, and one song in particular is excellent.
The stunts, including the boat and helicopter chase scenes, are impressive for a Telugu film made in 1991.
If you missed this film in the 90s, there's no pressing need to watch it now.
B & B: Bujji and Bhairava (2024)
Disappointing
The newly released two-episode animated prequel for the highly anticipated Indian sci-fi mythological movie falls short of expectations, offering little more than a familiar rehash of well-trodden Hollywood tropes.
From the outset, the backdrop feels strikingly derivative, reminiscent of the Star Wars series and other iconic sci-fi franchises. The sense of déjà vu permeates every detail, making it difficult to engage with the story on its own merits.
Set in the year 2898 CE, the narrative follows Bhairava, a bounty hunter struggling to make ends meet in a futuristic town. His dream is to amass enough wealth to gain entry into an exclusive society. The plot kicks off when Bhairava discovers a talking robot head named Bujji in a dump yard. Bujji, with its cute appearance, assists Bhairava in building a car, which becomes central to their pursuit of a big bounty. However, the story stagnates here, offering little progression and leaving much to be desired in terms of plot development. While this might captivate younger audiences or those unfamiliar with foreign sci-fi, it lacks originality and depth for seasoned viewers.
The animation quality is subpar, failing to live up to the standards expected from a high-budget production. This detracts significantly from the viewing experience, making it difficult to become immersed in the world being depicted.
Voice acting is another area where the prequel disappoints. Prabhas, voicing Bhairava, seems to struggle with the role, despite his best efforts. The character's youthful appearance does not align well with Prabhas' mature voice, creating a jarring disconnect. Keerthi Suresh's attempt to infuse Bujji with a sense of cuteness and humor falls flat, and her performance feels miscast. A more experienced dubbing artist like Savita Reddy would have been a far better choice, potentially bringing the necessary charm and wit to the character.
In conclusion, this animated prequel fails to impress. It suffers from unoriginal storytelling, lackluster animation, and misaligned voice acting. While it might hold some appeal for children and those new to sci-fi, it does little to build excitement for the upcoming live-action film.
Gam Gam Ganesha (2024)
except for a few laughs...
The story follows a typical crime comedy template, with various groups vying to grab something valuable to secure a big payday. Unfortunately, the narrative is bogged down by too many unnecessary characters, making it feel cluttered and forced.
The plot is predictable and lacks freshness, with only a few comedy scenes hitting the mark while others fall flat. The second half drags significantly, becoming quite boring as the story progression comes to a standstill. The climax is filled with silly plot twists that end up being more irritating than entertaining.
On the positive side, the making is stylish, and the cinematography is good, with decent production values. However, the acting is mediocre, and the female leads don't contribute much to the story. The songs are also disappointing, failing to leave a lasting impression.
Gangs of Godavari (2024)
👎
The story feels pretty routine, bringing back memories of many older films, and the presentation isn't fresh either. The narration fails to engage, especially in the second half, and the screenplay is a bit dull overall. However, the pre-interval segment is good, and the lorry fight scene, reminiscent of the movie "Khaidi," is also well done. Unfortunately, the climax falls flat.
Vishwak Sen gives a decent performance, with a good look, though his dialogue delivery could use improvement.
Anjali delivers a strong performance, with a character that reminds us of Sex Bomb Anasuya from "Rangasthalam."
Neha Shetty has a small but important role and does okay.
The antagonists needed to be more serious and menacing.
The background score is lacking, and most of the songs are forgettable except for one.
On the brighter side, the cinematography is good. However, the direction is below average.
Ramanna Youth (2023)
Opinion
The concept is solid, and the story is decent. The screenplay could have been more entertaining and engaging, but it feels more like a documentary. The direction is good, and the acting is top-notch, with everyone doing a great job. The music is just average. The locations are natural but not particularly eye-catching. Cinematography is a bit of a letdown; it's decent considering the budget, but the color grading and greenish-yellow tint aren't great. Give it a watch if the trailer catches your eye.
Need to write 96 more characters to complete the review, so just ignore this last line, thank you.
Love Me If You Dare (2024)
What the F...How? Why?
Oh, where do I begin with this masterpiece of cinematic brilliance? The basic concept is nothing short of a genius concoction of utter nonsense, a true testament to the filmmaker's disdain for logic and coherence.
The story and narration? Absolutely bonkers, as if scripted by someone who had never encountered the notion of a coherent plot.
The screenplay? Well, it's a treasure trove of stupidity, with scenes so bafflingly idiotic you can't help but marvel at the audacity.
And the dialogues? Pure poetry, if your idea of poetry is a series of ludicrously silly exchanges that would make a toddler cringe.
Ah, the direction! Equally stunning in its mediocrity. A masterclass in how not to direct a movie.
Ashish's acting is a revelation, in the sense that it's below average even on a good day, with dialogue delivery that sounds like he's reading a grocery list.
Vaishnavi, bless her heart, gave it her all, which is commendable given the material she had to work with.
The rest of the cast? They tried, oh how they tried, valiantly attempting to make something out of the cinematic equivalent of a dumpster fire.
The art work and cinematography are good, which is a delightful contrast to the train wreck unfolding on screen.
And the music? It's okay, in the way that elevator music is okay - it's there, it's passable, but it certainly doesn't save the day.
Watch this film only if you're in the mood for some self-inflicted torture. It's a true marvel of modern filmmaking, designed to test the limits of your sanity.
Aarambham (2024)
This is not Deja Vu.
The underlying concept of the Telugu science fiction film demonstrates promise, offering a compelling premise for exploration.
However, the execution falls short as the storyline unfolds with only average delivery.
The narration proves to be convoluted, leaving viewers grappling with confusion throughout.
The screenplay, while attempting to convey the narrative, feels lacking in maturity and fails to fully engage the audience.
The direction of the film is notably deficient, with evident imperfections detracting from the overall viewing experience. The musical score, while passable, does little to elevate the film's impact.
Cinematography manages to shine in select moments, capturing visually striking scenes.
Regrettably, the acting fails to leave a lasting impression, lacking the depth needed to bring the characters to life.
Contrary to the plot's description, the film centers more on themes of time travel and teleportation rather than the initially suggested concept of deja vu.
Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024)
Honest Opinion.
Yo, this flick is straight-up whack.
The plot? Trash, like they wrote a parody version of"Mad Max: Fury Road" and called it a day.
Production values look like they had a budget of five bucks and some pocket lint.
And that orange tint? Oh, because who needs the sophistication of a feature film when you can have the stunning realism of a video game? Welcome to "Grand Theft Cinema"!
If you're a Dune fan, you'll be rolling your eyes so hard they'll get stuck.
Chris Hemsworth trying to be serious? Bruh, that was comedy gold, and not in a good way.
Anya Taylor-Joy? Overhyped like an Instagram filter, and this movie proves she ain't got the range. Comparing her to Charlize Theron? Don't even.
The stunts? I wasn't feeling them, but hey, maybe you like watching basic action.
The music? Just there, nothing to write home about.
Bottom line, I wouldn't waste my time on this, but if you're cool with basic, mediocre flicks, knock yourself out.
Prasanna Vadanam (2024)
NA
Prasanna Vadanam has a few glimmers of a good idea, and parts of the story do catch your interest. The screenplay kicks off strong and wraps up nicely in the climax, but everything in between is pretty hit or miss. As for the acting, let's just say Suhas sticks to his usual playbook-nothing new there.
The music? Not exactly earworm material, and the production values don't do much to lift the spirits either.
All in all, it might be a pass on catching this one in theaters. Save it for a no-fuss, low-expectation kind of movie night at home, if at all.
I have to write 40 more characters to complete..
Aranmanai 4 (2024)
If you want to Kill some Time.
So, "Aranmanai 4" is back, and it's like that friend who always has a new story but never quite nails the delivery. The plot throws a bone with something intriguing, but it doesn't really flesh it out, and we're left with the same old average screenplay and narration vibe from the trilogy's earlier escapades.
The comedy's a mixed bag. Some bits will have you cackling, while others might just have you staring blankly. And those jump scares? Yeah, they're more miss than hit.
On the bright side, the story does step it up a notch from the third installment, and the laughs are better than what we got in the second-so, progress? The twists are a bit of a see-saw too-some you won't see coming, others you'll spot from a mile away.
Props to Thamanna, Kovai Sarala and Rashi Khanna, though-they brought their A-game. The VFX? Not top-tier but charming in their own quirky way-might even be a hit with the kiddos.
The production values hold up pretty decently. Oh, and about that sizzling promotional song with Tamanna and Rashi that got you all hyped? Yeah, they skipped that part in the actual movie. Bummer, right?
Bottom line-if you're hunting for a blockbuster-level thrill, this might not be your ticket. But hey, if you're just looking to kill some time and need a few laughs, "Aranmanai 4" could be your casual hangout flick.
Heeramandi: The Diamond Bazaar (2024)
Dreary Narration with Splendid Visuals.
The tale is a dreary and nonsensical affair.
The screenplay proves a tiresome, protracted bore.
The dialogue is insipid and trite.
Performances are utterly devoid of vitality.
The production values, however, are quite lavish.
The locales are top-notch.
The sets and their adornments are simply splendid.
The costumes are exceptionally fine.
The makeup is rather pleasing.
Cinematography is nothing short of remarkable.
The lighting is impeccable.
Alas, the direction feels hopelessly antiquated.
Its a mixed bag of splendid visuals and dreary narration not recommended for viewing.
****4****
Rathnam (2024)
👎
The story offers little novelty, laden with clichéd and silly elements.
The screenplay feels outdated, and the dialogue frequently induces cringes.
The film also suffers from excessive violence and songs that seem shoehorned in without necessity.
The acting follows a dated Tamil template reminiscent of the early 2000s, failing to bring anything fresh to the table.
Direction sticks to the typical 'Hari' style, characterized by rapid-paced editing, which doesn't compensate for the film's other shortcomings.
It's advisable to skip this film altogether.
Not recommended to watch on OTT either.
Geethanjali Malli Vachindi (2024)
Not Recommended.
This horror-comedy effort falls disappointingly short of the mark. The narrative is plagued by silliness and a lack of logical cohesion, with numerous superfluous elements clumsily integrated.
The screenplay, particularly in the initial segments, is uninspired and lacks dynamism. It's only in the latter half that a few comedic moments manage to shine through, offering a glimmer of redemption.
Performance-wise, Anjali delivers an adequate portrayal, though her presence is unfortunately limited. Sathya stands out with a commendable performance, and Sunil also brings a solid contribution. Srinivasa Reddy and the remainder of the ensemble offer passable performances, while the antagonist fails to impress, suffering from both underdeveloped characterisation and lacklustre acting.
The film is further marred by its inadequate production values, with the choice of locations and sets reflecting a disappointing economisation. Both cinematography and music struggle to reach a satisfactory standard.
Overall, this cinematic venture does not merit the investment of time, falling well below the threshold of recommended viewing.
Maidaan (2024)
Worthwhile Experience
An engaging narrative unfolds, albeit one that tarries longer than necessary, yet redeemed by a screenplay of commendable craft. A scattering of the dialogue sparkles with wit and intelligence.
Ajay Devgn delivers a performance of gravitas and depth, while Priyamani dazzles, imbuing her role with a radiant excellence. Gajraj Rao, along with the ensemble, contributes performances of substantial merit.
The auditory landscape and visual storytelling through cinematography are executed with competence. Direction navigates the middle ground of proficiency, neither astounding nor disappointing.
In essence, this cinematic venture merits the allocation of one's time for viewing, presenting a worthwhile experience.
Bahumukham (2024)
Watch it in theatres
This movie is a breath of fresh air in a landscape often cluttered with rehashed plots and formulaic storytelling. It delivers a fresh story that captivates from the get-go, infused with a modern style screenplay that keeps you hooked with its smart pacing and inventive narrative twists.
The acting across the board is impressively natural. The cast brings authenticity to their roles, making the characters relatable and the emotional beats of the story genuinely impactful. It's refreshing to see performances that feel so real and unforced, contributing significantly to the film's immersive experience.
Production values are decent, striking a balance between quality and restraint. The film looks good without going overboard on extravagance, supporting the story and characters without overshadowing them. It's clear that the budget was used wisely, focusing on enhancing the storytelling rather than distracting from it with unnecessary flash.
Overall, it's a well-crafted movie that stands out for its creativity and genuine portrayal of its characters. Definitely worth watching for anyone seeking something different from the usual fare, proving that good storytelling and solid performances are still the heart of great cinema.
Tantra (2024)
Hard Pass
This flick is a wild ride into the land of "what were they thinking?" territory. It's got a sprinkle of decent moments, sure, but then it's like they decided to bulk up the script with all sorts of nonsense, as if someone's younger sibling got hold of the draft and went to town with a crayon.
The screenplay is a disaster - imagine trying to assemble a puzzle where none of the pieces fit, and for some reason, they're all covered in glue. It's a struggle, and not the rewarding kind. And the dialogues? They're so clunky and awkward, you'll find yourself wincing more than anything else.
Directing seems to have been an afterthought, with the whole thing coming off as if someone watched a couple of YouTube tutorials and declared themselves a director. It's amateur hour from start to finish, lacking any sort of coherence or finesse.
Don't even get me started on the production values. If cutting corners was an Olympic sport, this movie would take home the gold. Everything from the sets to the costumes screams budget cuts, making you wonder just how much they actually spent on making this film.
As for the acting, well, it's about as inspiring as a wet napkin. No one seems to be putting in much effort, with performances ranging from "barely there" to "please stop."
In short, this movie's a hard pass. It's not even worth the watch for ironic enjoyment or as a background noise. There are countless better ways to spend your time.
Family Star (2024)
Crap
This movie is a hot mess wrapped in a pretty package. It's like they threw a bunch of stuff at the wall, hoping something would stick, but ended up with a jumble of silly, bad and stale bits that don't quite gel together.
The screenplay is a roller coaster, but not the fun kind. You may get a few moments of laughter, but then you're plunged into scenes so ridiculous or dull you'll wonder if the script was written during a group brainstorm where no ideas were turned down, no matter how nonsensical.
The whole vibe of the film feels like it's stuck in a time warp, clinging to an old-school approach that's more yawn-inducing than nostalgic. And, boy, could they have shaved off some runtime. It drags like a lecture that could've been an email.
Vijay's shines in bits and pieces, but even his charm can't fully distract from the chaos.
Mrunal is not really matching up with Vijay, and her performance feels as if she's stuck on repeat, recycling the same handful of expressions we've seen in her last few outings. The rest of the cast? They're just there, doing their thing, not making things worse but not adding much either.
On the technical front, they've splurged. Cinematography, sets, costumes - all top-notch, making you wish the story and direction had received half that attention. Background score gives you headache and the songs make for a good time to check your phone or go for a snack.
Honestly, unless you've been hyped up by all the marketing or feel the unbearable peer pressure from your mates who can't resist jumping on every movie bandwagon, give this one a miss. It's not worth the sit-through, unless you enjoy critiquing every aspect or need background noise while doing something actually interesting.
Tillu Square (2024)
Missed the Mark
"Tillu Square" graces the scene as the chic follow-up to "DJ Tillu," bearing a striking resemblance with about 80% of its DNA mirroring the original. Within its framework, it introduces two novel elements, hitting a mixed note with one being a hit and the other, unfortunately, missing the mark.
Narrative-wise, it's passable. Our lead, Tillu, retains his charm, albeit not quite capturing the magic of his debut performance. The screenplay is a mixed bag, featuring a handful of scenes that pop, a few that miss the mark, and others that simply fail to ignite, leaving the rest to fall squarely in the realm of mediocrity.
Production quality holds up well, with both cinematography and musical scores earning their stripes. Direction is on point, ensuring the film sails smoothly through its paces.
Siddu, in his element, delivers a sterling performance, living up to expectations. Anupama, while earnest in her efforts, seems to tread into the territory of overacting in her recent outings-a trend that's puzzling, to say the least.
The supporting cast turns in a decent performance, though none stand out as particularly memorable.
For aficionados of the original, "Tillu Square" might warrant a look, albeit with a grain of caution. Otherwise, feel free to give it a miss.
The Goat Life (2024)
Could have been GREAT
So, this flicks based on a real-deal story, right? And they've scribbled it down legit. But man, the screenplay's like they got commitment issues-it just goes on and on. And those flashback scenes early on? Snoozefest. Could've skipped 'em and missed nada.
But yo, when they hit the desert scenes? Pure fire. They nailed it. Characters are sketched out like art.
PrithviRaj, though? Dude went full beast mode. Blood, sweat, and probably tears in his role. Every scene, you can tell he's giving it his all. Major respect for that hustle.
Then there's Jimmi Jean Louis. My guy is on another level. His character's so dope, you'll be thinking about him while brushing your teeth at night. Dude's unforgettable.
On the flip, production's slick, music's hitting just right, and the camera work? Chef's kiss.
Om Bheem Bush (2024)
Horrable
The film is marred by a nonsensical plot, grating scenes, vexatious characters, and dreadful dialogue, making for an altogether excruciating viewing experience. The idea of a ghost in the movie is pretty common, but the story about why someone turns into a ghost is interesting and fresh. The first half of the movie moves slowly, and the moment before the intermission feels predictable, the music isn't great, and the visual effects (VFX) don't impress much either. The cinematography, on the other hand, is well done. The main actors, Sri Vishnu, Priyadarshi, and Rahul Rama Krishna are very annoying but the actor playing the ghost does a really good job.
Ae Watan Mere Watan (2024)
USHA MEHTA
The film presents a commendable narrative that beautifully balances patriotism in a nuanced manner. While the screenplay might not captivate everyone, the effort to steer clear of religious and political bias is praiseworthy, contributing positively to the film's integrity. Sara is mediocre but rest of he cast delivers decent performances with the material they're given. Production aspects, including the choice of locations, sets, and costumes, are satisfactorily executed, enhancing the visual appeal of the movie.
Although the cinematography falls short of expectations, it's evident that there was an ambitious vision behind the camera. The direction, despite showing signs of inexperience, demonstrates a commendable effort and a genuine attempt to realize the film's potential. In essence, this movie, with its heart in the right place, is worth watching for those with a keen interest in the subject matter. It's a film that manages to appreciate its themes and aims to deliver a meaningful experience, albeit with some areas for improvement.
Razakar: The Silent Genocide of Hyderabad (2024)
NA
The narrative draws inspiration from actual events in the history of Telangana, depicting the hardships endured by its people under the Nizam's rule and the brutalities of the Razakars.
However, the presentation of the story appears to be biased and slightly altered for political and religious motives.
The screenplay features a handful of commendable scenes interspersed with numerous dull and lackluster segments.
The film ambitiously attempts to merge the gritty essence of realism with the vibrant energy of commercial cinema, yet it finds itself caught in the crossfire, not fully committing to either. This indecision is further intensified by an overreliance on violence, which, rather than adding depth or excitement, muddies the narrative's intent.
The production values do not meet the expected standards. Musically, background score is commendable.
From an acting perspective,
Bobby Simha and Prema deliver decent performances.
The roles of Anasuya and Vedika in the film seem perplexing with their terrible acting.
Antagonist and the remaining cast members tend to overact.
The director, despite displaying an air of overconfidence in interviews, delivers a direction that is less than satisfactory.
Overall, the film is not that good.
Gaami (2024)
State of the art
The story is laced with intriguing elements, and while there might be a handful of moments that don't fully hit the mark, the overall narrative is quite engaging. The screenplay demands your undivided attention and a keen mind to fully appreciate its depth, adding a layer of sophistication to the viewing experience. There are moments where the pace might seem leisurely, but these are more than made up for by the sheer visual spectacle on display. The film features breathtaking visuals, from exotic locales to state-of-the-art VFX, complemented by exceptional cinematography and impeccable color grading. The background music enhances the atmosphere significantly, and while the songs are decent, the outstanding sound quality elevates the auditory experience.
Vishwak Sen's dedication shines through in his performance; although it might not fully meet the demands of the role, his effort is commendable. The rest of the cast delivers with commendable zeal, contributing to a well-rounded ensemble. For those considering watching this film, it's best experienced in a theater that does justice to its superior sound and visual quality, ensuring the fullest appreciation of its technical excellence.